The
theory of the majority of Buxtonians being innocents is
fully supported by the Jagdeo Government for his own
reasons - to cover up his weakness and ineffectiveness
in dealing condignly with the terrorists. What strange
bedfellows conflict makes.
Devi Mathura |
|
President's
answers were not satisfactory
Dear Editor,
I would like to quote our President's words as published
in the Stabroek News under the topic "PNC/R must
distance itself from criminals - Jagdeo" dated
October 23rd 2002, and offer my comments thereon.
1. The President remarked that "there are leakages
and we do not have enough intelligence on the criminals.
Some of the leakages may be accidental but some people
have fears that they may be coming from some policemen
or soldiers and this may be complicating the problem
also. President
Jagdeo acknowledged that there are traitors in the
police and army.
2. According to Mr. Jagdeo, "there is also a great
deal of political interference and cover for the crimes
being committed but inspite of the difficulties we have
had some good success."
How
can you Mr. Jagdeo publicly state that your
administration has some good success against robberies,
shootings, killings, hijackings more so control
of the criminals.
3. He said that he had no doubt that the law enforcement
officers will soon get on top of the situation but noted
that politics was complicating the situation with
divided loyalties. President Jagdeo you have admitted
that there are traitors in the police and army but still
you have no doubt that the law enforcement officers will
soon get on top of the situation. You
are dreaming, Mr. President, be realistic we are dealing
with intelligence, if it is leaked law and order and the
nation loses and the criminal wins which is a fact every
day in Guyana. You are the Commander in Chief; your job
is to hold any police or soldier liable to the full
extent of the law if they fail to carry out their duty
with honour.
4. The call by some for the government to solicit
foreign troops to assist the police in their fight
against crime was dismissed as foolish.
"No
Caribbean country, the United Kingdom, the United States
of America or Canada would send policemen or troops to
Guyana. They
will probably give you a few advisers but will not send
policemen to solve our crimes." President Jagdeo,
accept the fact that if this problem could have been
solved by the local police and army why is the situation
getting worse day after day?
5. What about declaring a limited state of emergency or
a curfew? "It will disadvantage ordinary people
more than criminals. If you introduce it and cannot
defend or enforce it then you become weaker than before.
If you cannot defend it because of political action,
what happens? If the PNC leader and a large group of his
supporters decide to break the curfew what do you
do?" I am afraid this is a very, very sad statement
for our leader to make. Mr. President who is more at
a disadvantage than the ordinary people with the
criminals on the loose?
You and your
administration have armed guards day and night while
ordinary Guyanese have sleepless nights because the
criminals are free to move around to commit their
crimes. Give me examples of where and when a State of
Emergency has failed to reduce crime. Why would you not
be able to defend a State of Emergency? If the leader of
the PNC and his supporters break the State of Emergency
then the police and army must use force to maintain the
law. If local forces can't maintain the State of
Emergency then call for help from Caricom, Organisation
of American States, England, U.S.A., Canada and the
United Nations.
President Jagdeo, Guyana needs a Leader who has
the courage to stand up and put out the injustices which
have plagued our nation since Independence. I call on
you to be the visionary that can pave the way for a
Guyana with law and order, which will result in
democracy, tolerance, solidarity and economic growth
with a bright future for all Guyanese regardless of
race, colour or political associations.
Yours faithfully,
R.
Persaud
|
|
|