There was a major
bust-up in the fledgling Alliance For
Change (AFC) party yesterday with its secretary
resigning after not being given the parliamentary
seat she said she was promised.

She also flayed the top two AFC leaders saying
that the party does not bode well for Guyana.
Attorney-at-law Gaumatie Singh who said she would
be handing in her resignation to the party today,
also made public an e-mail between herself and the
party's presidential candidate Raphael Trotman,
where he told her that new parliamentarian Chantalle
Smith was only given the seat to ensure her a salary
but would resign the seat as soon as the party can
guarantee her an income and then Singh would be
given the seat.
Singh at a fiery press conference yesterday said
she was promised a seat by the party leadership once
the party had secured more than three seats. The
woman said that people had already started to
congratulate her on her parliamentary seat. So, she
was shocked on Thursday morning when she saw a GECOM
notice listing the AFC's members of parliament as
Trotman, Khemraj Ramjattan, Sheila Holder, David
Patterson and Smith.
She said that less than six weeks ago she had
been informed by Ramjattan in his capacity as leader
of the party and Holder, vice-chairman, and as
recently as last week Friday, that she was the
number four person chosen for parliament.
Last evening in a press statement the party said
that the leadership was taken aback by its
secretary, "being so disgruntled with
her non-selection as a parliamentarian." While
not addressing some of the core issues Singh raised
at her press conference, the party said her remarks
were "most unfortunate" while adding that
the selection of the five names out of a long list
would have caused disappointments.
"The leadership, however, asserts that the
process for the selection was entirely democratic.
At the leadership meeting on Tuesday 5th of
September 2006, where Mrs. Singh was a participant,
the short-listing of names and the criteria for the
final selection were both given her approval,"
the statement said.
The statement said that all the names on the
shortlist are persons of merit and competence and
that any of the persons could have been selected.
"The judgment call was then given to the
representative of the list to make; and, he so
did."
The party said it would accept Singh's
resignation.
"The leadership wishes to recognize the
efforts Mrs. Singh put in during the campaign and
all the work she did since the launch of the party
in October 2005. It is indeed a departure that has
saddened the entire leadership, which still holds
her in high regard and esteem," the AFC said,
adding that the statement would be the final one on
the issue.
Bluff
Appearing upset, Singh said after reading the
newspaper notice she immediately called Ramjattan
and questioned him.
"He tried to bluff his way through in giving
me an explanation that he did not know what was
printed in his papers [and] I am now bringing his
attention to news. I thereafter called Sheila Holder
[and] she said the same thing. . . She doesn't know
what I am talking about, 'Gaumatie have you received
an e-mail?' [she asked me]," Singh reported.
She said for the longest while she had not received
an e-mail from the party because they were all busy
campaigning and she was assigned in Region Two,
Pomeroon\Supenaam and had to spend weeks away from
home.
The woman said she then called Trotman but his
number was busy but shortly after she received an
e-mail from Trotman circulated to all the members of
the steering committee informing them about the list
of persons selected for parliament.
She responded by firing off a response to the
e-mail in which she informed Trotman that he had
"made a grave mistake in your selection and
certainly I am not going to leave it as that simple.
You show blatant and total disregard for my work
when you know fully well my vehicles, my time, the
closure of my Essequibo office, the weeks I spent
away from my family, personal cash, etc.
Nevertheless, if the AFC was to pay me could you all
start the calculation? I have plans ahead and it
will certainly take some of you by surprise just as
you think you surprise the supporters of the AFC.
You certainly prove to be another PNC and
dictator," her response concluded.
"I replied and it was out of haste
that I did mention that I see him now as a PNC and
as a dictator. My apologies I have no hard feelings
against the PNC but seeing the man there certainly
tells me that he has executed high handedness in
choosing the persons to sit in parliament," the
woman said yesterday at her press conference.
Trotman's e-mail reply to her said that he was
sorry that Singh felt the way she did and he had a
very hard decision to make between her and Smith.
"Because she (Smith) is the CEO and we have to
guarantee income for her, it was necessary to
provide a benefit until the foundation and the way
forward is settled. As soon as this is in place and
I believe that it should not be more than a few
months, Chantalle will resign to work on promoting
the foundation. The seat will be yours if you are
still interested and that is a solemn promise on my
part. I hope that you will still be with us.
"Because I know that you are upset I will
forgive the reference to being a 'PNC dictator'. The
irony is that the PNC types see me as the greatest
traitor to their cause for forming the AFC and
'splitting' their vote. My life was even under
threat twice during the campaign. Making decisions
is never easy but someone has to do it and in this
instance that someone is me. I will continue to hold
you in high regard and will always value the work
and sacrifice that you have put into making the AFC
what it is today," the e-mail said.
Singh said the reason given by Trotman for
Smith's selection for parliament is one that does
not auger well for the country. "I think
persons should be chosen to serve as members of
parliament to serve the interest of this nation and
not to have a self-serving interest. Definitely from
the e-mail there it is a self- serving interest if
you are going to tell me someone is going there to
guarantee her income, I think that is a blatant
disrespect for the people and supporters of the
Alliance for Change and the people of this
country," a still upset Singh said.
"And those are my concerns. . . as a matter
of fact some people may think that I shouldn't move
to the media. I think I have a right to move to the
media because there are people outside there who are
looking forward to see what is happening," she
said.
Asked if party unity was not more important than
a seat in parliament, Singh said she believed so.
"...I think it was blatant disrespect and
deceit for misleading me into believing that I had a
seat and broadcasting it all over where I was
working in the courts that I was selected for the
parliament. That means they have no respect at all
for my integrity and my character."
Singh then trained her attack on Ramjattan saying
he has to stand strong as the Indian people who
supported the AFC did not come to the party because
of him since 75% of them do not trust him.
"They voted for the Alliance for Change
because they thought that Gaumattie Singh was the
person who was going to be selected in parliament to
give representation on Indian people's behalf.
"Where is the ethnic balance (among the AFC
parliamentarians) that we have stood on the platform
and talked about? Look at the composition that was
selected for parliament?"
When asked what she had brought to the party the
lawyer said in the area where she campaigned in
Region Two, 1,722 persons voted for the AFC and when
compared percentage wise to what Ramjattan and David
Patterson brought out of Region Six and Nine
respectively she did far better than they did.
Singh said further that she had letters of
resignation from 25 AFC members and more are to be
given to her and most of those resignations were
from the Canal Number One area.
She said there was no turning back for her
regarding her decision to resign but the issue would
test the party's strength. However, she acknowledged
that other than not being granted the parliamentary
seat she had no other problem with the AFC.


Former Alliance For Change (AFC) secretary, Ms. Gaumatie Singh (left) chasing AFC presidential candidate Raphael Trotman (right), for not being given the parliamentary seat she said she was promised